Saturday, March 13, 2010
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Shit like this is why we can never have normal conversations with people:
[17:28] Courfeyac: http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/03/ff_andrew_brietbart/all/1
[17:28] Courfeyac: read. rage.
[17:29] Courfeyac: both at the douchery and at the skill with which the douche turns important things into a game.
[17:29] _J_: That man gets it
[17:31] Courfeyac: Christ. that's the thing. GETTING it? Is all about throwing "agreed upon conventions" to the wind. Like Cary drafting Unglued.
[17:32] Courfeyac: I mean, you're right.. and yet, it's the brazen willingness to drop, discredit, or devalue things we expect and hold of value in journalism.
[17:32] _J_: I admire people who can play systems against their selves
[17:32] Courfeyac: I admire the skill. But I don't admire people who do it shortsightedly, people who don't have an understanding of where their actions will take them.
[17:33] Courfeyac: Which is Breitbart to a T.
[17:33] Courfeyac: Fucker is playing the short game, in the name of glory and immediate points, and has no clue about his goals.
[17:33] Courfeyac: or any self-examination, honestly.
[17:34] _J_: true
[17:34] _J_: but perhaps his goals are only for the short term
[17:34] Courfeyac: that's what kills me. And to be fair, it kills you, too.
[17:34] _J_: of course, everyone needs an endgame
[17:34] _J_: but maybe his is to go hide on an island somewhere when it all blows up
[17:35] Courfeyac: When you put together a deck that abuses something like Mindslaver... and does it well.. only to get screwed by a deck Kyle or Cary just threw together that HAPPENS to have your killer in it. some random card that silverbullets it....
[17:35] _J_: Right
[17:35] _J_: We exploit the rules of a system so that, if we value the system, the system can be enhanced
[17:35] Courfeyac: you seethe. Not because you were stopped by the player.. but becuase it wasn't PLAYED, it was kismet, happenstance.
[17:35] _J_: which is why we play Dragons at T1 doubles
[17:35] _J_: to get worldgorger banned
[17:35] Courfeyac: ... Bingo.
[17:36] Courfeyac: And you weren't at all pissed when you got screwed by Kismet, even though it ruined you, because you didn't even know aobut it.
[17:36] _J_: We try to be the people who find the holes in the systems which matter
[17:36] _J_: Right
[17:36] _J_: Kismet is something which existed in the system which maintained the integrity of the system
[17:36] _J_: Just not enough people play it
[17:36] Courfeyac: it had a point in his game, and you were simply unprepared. Thing is.. Breitbart's playing a totally different game.
[17:36] _J_: ah
[17:37] Courfeyac: He's playing say, Type 2 competitive, without having any clue how his success will warp the format.
[17:37] _J_: So he's abusing skullclamp not for the sake of demonstrating the flaw in skullclamp, but to win?
[17:39] Courfeyac: but to win is a good argument.. but I'd go further, and say he's the kinda guy who doesn't see how it's bad for the format. So he'll bitch about it when it's banned, and further, assume his winnings were his skill and intellegence, not the sheer power of the 'clamp
[17:39] Courfeyac: He'll do that in part to distract others from looking at his other broken bits, like the rest of Affinity.
[17:39] _J_: So, he's abusing skullclamp, without any mind for what will happen when skullclamp is removed?
[17:39] Courfeyac: but also becuase he honestly belives they're cutting it to cut HIM.
[17:40] Courfeyac: Sounds right.
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Eva is a story of repetition.
It is a story where our protagonist faces the same situation many times over and determinedly picks himself back up again.
It is a story of the will to move forward, even if only a little.
It is a story of the resolve to want to be together, even though it is frightening to have contact with others and to endure ambiguous loneliness.
I would be most gratified if you find enjoyment in these 4 parts as it takes the same story and metamorphoses into something different.
- Hideaki Anno
I understood Evangelion:1.01 to be a theatrical remake of episodes one through six of the Neon Genesis Evangelion television series. And, initially, I was correct. This film starts as a scene-for-scene remake of the television series spruced up via new animation and CG effects. But as the story progresses one comes to realize a shocking truth: this is not a simple remake; this is something different; this is a new Evangelion.
I came to this realization during the scene in which Shinji is first introduced to Evangelion Unit 01. In the series, this scene is the first instance of Unit 01 activating itself to protect Shinji. But in the film, Eva Unit 01 does not activate. So I thought to myself, "Wait a minute...in episode 20 Misato remarks that Eva 01 activated three times...they just removed the first time!" So I wondered how the film series would reflect this change, how they would alter the narrative to account for the lack of this initial self-activation of Unit 01. I stopped wondering this as the film progressed and I came to realize that, well, this is a new story.
I am not going to list all of the changes. If you give a damn about Evangelion then you deserve to experience these changes as I experienced them. You deserve to experience the feeling of minding your own business only to have your jaw drop, your eyes bug out, and to be overwhelmed by an inexplicable feeling of shock as you think aloud, to an empty room, "WHAT THE FUCK JUST HAPPENED?!?!"
The overall experience of the film is enjoyable. Memorable scenes from episodes one through six are replicated with, at the least, animation enhancements and, at the most, CG enhancements. For the most part, the CG enhancements meld seamlessly with the animation. There were only a few moments of painfully gratuitous CGI. Overall, the aesthetic experience is enjoyable and I appreciated the enhancements.
Also, the musical score retains the memorable songs from the series yet utilizes them in a far more tasteful and enjoyable manner. There are times in the original series where one finds the music to be annoying or jarring yet I thought music to be well-utilized in the film.
The English voice cast maintains only Spike Spencer and Allison Keith, the voices of Shinji and Misato from the original series. While this is initially quite jarring one eventually comes to accept the new voices. My main regret is that they lost Tristan MacAvery, the original voice of Gendo Ikari, because he was a fucking awesome Gendo Ikari. Rei's new voice actress is quite charming. And, let's be honest, Rei's is not a difficult voice to do. Asuka is not in this first film, but my understanding is that Tiffany Grant will not be the voice for the films. I withhold judgment on whether this is good or bad.
An aspect of the film which bothered me is the minor changes to the script. I have seen the original series I think 14 times, so I have most of the dialog memorized. So in scenes which are replicated between the television series and the film I was at a loss to explain why the dialog changed. For the most part characters say the same things, but in different ways. This was especially consternating with lines of Shinji and Misato. When the same voice actors are saying, basically, the same things in the same scenes one wonders why the lines would change and why the voice inflection would change.
For example, when Shinji first enters Misato's apartment this is the dialog difference:
Shinji: I'm home.
Misato: Welcome home.
Shinji: Home sweet home.
Misato: Home sweet home.
I will admit that I am not comfortable with change, and so I recognize that my concern for these sorts of changes may be without merit. But come the fuck on; did that shit really need to change?
I think the most impressive accomplishment of Evangelion:1.01 is that it maintains the feel of the original series. It is often the case that a film adaptation will blatantly and brashly introduce a character rather than allow the audience to come to know the character. Given that the core narrative of Evangelion is manifest via one's coming to sympathize with Shinji, I appreciate that this film articulates his character in much the same way as the series. The film covers six episodes worth of content in 98 minutes yet still maintains the same feel and, for the most part, pacing of the series. This is impressive.
The ultimate point I need make, though, is that Evangelion:1.01 You Are (Not) Alone is not simply a remake of Neon Genesis Evangelion. This is a new narrative. To quote Hideaki Anno, this is a metamorphosis of the narrative from the series into something new, something different. If you watched Neon Genesis Evangelion you have not seen Evangelion:1.01. The film series is something else.
Perhaps this is best explained by comparing Evangelion to Star Wars. Remember how the Star Wars - Special Edition version of A New Hope was basically a prettier version of A New Hope with more Dewbacks? Alright. Evangelion:1.01 is not prettier Evangelion + Dewbacks. Evangelion:1.01 is like if in the Special Edition of A New Hope Luke Skywalker had a brother...and Obi-Wan didn't die.
At the moment my curiosity is whether it is best to watch the film or the television series first. Initially I thought it would be best to watch the episodes first and then the film, to think of the film as a supplement to the series. But given that the film is something else...I remain unsure. I mean, the Evangelion television series was released in the states in 1998. So one way of experiencing the film is to have watched the series repeatedly since 1998 and then come to watch the film. As that is an impossibility for a new viewer, I wonder what the experience would be to either watch the episodes tomorrow and watch the film the next day, or watch the film tomorrow and watch the episodes the next day. In my estimation it is best to have watched the series repeatedly since the late 90s and then watch the film. But if that is not possible...best to just feel bad for not having watched the series already, you fucking slacker.
One last thing. When you watch it? Watch through the end of the credits. Oh sweet mother of Christ watch through the end of the credits. Actually, that answers my curiosity. You'll only understand what happens after the credits if you have watched the television series.
So, go watch the first six episodes of Neon Genesis Evangelion. Then watch Evangelion:1.01.
And watch through the end of the credits.
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
We have talked about Tom Metzger before. In July, his home was raided by the ATF in connection with an investigation of into Dennis and Daniel Mahon who are suspected of mailing a bomb that injured three in Scottsdale, AZ.
Well. That was pretty awesome. As we know Tom Metzger is among America's greatest douchbags. Well there is some news on the the dipshit front. The Times-Union is reporting that Metzger is going to run for congress, we assume of the dipshit ticket. Quoting:
Warsaw resident and avowed white supremacist Tom Metzger is seeking the Third District U.S. Congressman seat as a write-in candidate.
Mark Souder currently holds the seat.
Souder (R-Fort Wayne) is seeking his ninth term and was elected to Congress in 1994 after working for U.S. Senator Dan Coats (R-IN) for 10 years during Coats' tenure in the House and Senate.
Ann Torpy, chief deputy clerk, said a write-in candidate for U.S. representative is not required to have a petition signed by voters.
They will only need to file a declaration of intent to be a write-in candidate with the Indiana Election Division by noon July 6.
Torpy said Metzger's name will not be on the May 4 primary ballot or the November 2 since he is a write-in candidate.
So there is that. I do not know what we here at Sith ought to be do about this. Any ideas?
Monday, March 8, 2010
Last fall, Mr. Laborman launched IDUMP4U.com, an e-business through which strangers pay him $10 to break up with their significant others by phone. He posts some of the heart-wrenching, sleazy and just-plain-uncomfortable recordings of the calls on his YouTube channel.
The Farmville Breakup:
Misty "Problem in the Bedroom":
Interview with the guy who runs the site.
I do not know if this is terrible or brilliant.