PBS.org has all of Season 2 Sherlock available. Episode 1 is only available for 3 more days. Watch it.
Saturday, June 23, 2012
Wednesday, June 20, 2012
The first episode of True Blood is kind of rough, but not quite in the way that most pilots are rough. Every show has to introduce a bunch of characters and give them a little time to establish what it is that they mean to the series overall, while still packing in a couple of plotlines to make the half hour work on its own. Or, since it's HBO, the whole hour.
True Blood is rough in that it really doesn't seem to move much beyond setting up what seems like it will be a central relationship (Sookie and Bill...which is their names...more on that in a moment), establishing the supporting characters with surprisingly little substance for a show that has an hour to work with, and then setting the groundrules for the particular brand of vampire/supernatural lore the show intends to follow. If that sounds like a lot, remember that this series takes place in New Orleans, so you have to add in a Southern Drawl Buffer, which is where you basically double the amount of time it takes to deliver a line of dialogue in response to the fact that each word has three times the number of syllables.
Add to that the genre-appropriately laughable way that the vampires extend their fangs like god damned switch blades, move with the super speed of a Benny Hill sketch, and brood, nay, languish at length in front of the camera, and it's hard to imagine a future in which I would continue to watch this show if I had not already paid tens and tens of dollars for it on disc.
And that (might as well) bring(s) us to the names. Sookie scoffs when she finds out that the brooding, nay, languishing vampire she finds is named Bill. And then he asks her if she's actually known by a longer, more reasonable moniker than Sookie (she is not). I appreciate that the show nods pretty early to the fact that it has given its characters pretty ridiculous names given the circumstances, but it is difficult to watch this show in 2012 without hearing Snookie more often than not. Not really the show's fault, granted, but getting back to the ludicrous way they film vampires either moving very very fast or contemplating very very slowly, it's a lot to accept.
And perhaps I'm taking a few cheap shots at a series I don't fully understand yet. That's absolutely possible. Maybe this is the Parks and Recreation of serialized vampire dramas where you watch a few episodes and grimace in a way that is nearly audible and move on until people everywhere convince you to take another look because it's changed, man.
I dunno. Episode 1 sucks, whether it's Star Wars or True Blood. I give it one episode out of a possible two on each disc, seriously?
Posted by MA17 at 11:25 AM
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
1.0.3 Patch Notes
•Magic Find will no longer be considered when looting objects in the environment such as chests, barrels, vases, pots, and corpses
•Weapon racks will no longer drop weapons 100% of the time
•Destructible objects no longer have a chance to drop items, and will only have a small chance to drop gold when destroyed
Magic Find now only affects mob kills, and non-mob drops have been nerfed.
I realize that Blizzard wants the game to be nothing more than killing elite packs, in order to prevent botting. This nerf indicates the draconian steps they are willing to take in order to quash any attempt to depart from their narrow-minded, juvenile vision for Diablo 3.
You want to smash barrels? You want to farm pots? You want to sell Whimsyshire cloud runs?
Go kill that reflect damage, immune minion, shielding, molten pack.
Oh, and don't even bother to kill a boss afterwards.
•The quality of the item for the fourth stack of Nephalem Valor from bosses has been slightly reduced
•Unique monsters in Hell and Inferno difficulty are no longer guaranteed to drop two Magic items when slain
Stop smashing vases. Stop opening chests. Stop killing bosses. Stop killing uniques.
Just farm elite packs.
•Elite packs (Champion/Rare) now drop an additional item for players with 5 stacks of Nephalem Valor, which is guaranteed to be of Rare quality
Because Jay Wilson hates anything that isn't killing elite packs.
They really just need to skip to the end, and remove everything from the game that isn't an elite pack. Just a big, empty, white room full of reflect damage mobs.
Or, no, they still need to put some trash between you and the reflect damage mobs. But that trash shouldn't drop any loot, ever, because then people might do something other than kill elite packs.
And if anyone farms anything other than elite packs, then the pedophile 911 Hitler AIDS terrorists win.
Monday, June 18, 2012
"Previously I thought of Diablo 3 as a new, shiny installment to the Diablo franchise. It was another context in which I could lose myself, farming for hours to amass countless digital treasures I could lord over people on message boards in an effort to feel superior. But now? This could be a job. An amazing, fantastic, wonderful job.
But more than that, I recognize that it will change how I play with people, how I fundamentally conceive of the game. Whenever I die, I'll realize that I just lost money, in terms of the loss of gold paid to repair my items. Whenever I loot D3's version of Mephisto, I'll conceive of each item as a dollar amount, as rent, food, or booze. When I create characters, I'll assess their utility in terms of gold / item acquisition. When I gear my characters, I'll pause at each unique to choose between using it, or selling it.
I'm already an asshole about Diablo 2 and WoW with respect to loot and gold, and in those games it's only about the inflated sense of self-importance I get from wearing item sets, or passively bragging about my gold total. But when those items, that gold, translates to real-people money? Fuck, man. Fuck!"
At the time, I conceived of the RMAH as a means to financial glory and rent payment. I could justify my habit by pointing to my bank account. I worried that it would negatively impact my gameplay experience, but only to the degree that it would make me slightly more of a prick.
Well, on June 12th Blizzard launched the RMAH. It turns out that I was correct: The RMAH does impact one's gameplay experience. Unfortunately, it impacts the experience to a greater degree than I anticipated. It's not about seeing dollar signs when loot drops, or assessing repair bills in terms of lost income. The real tragedy of the RMAH is this simple idea:
I have made $.58 per hour playing Diablo 3.
The entirety of the Diablo 3 gameplay experience can be reduced to a ratio of dollars to hours.
That idea is what I didn't fully grasp last august. That idea is the fundamental problem with the RMAH, and why Diablo 3 shall probably be a failure. That idea is the splinter in your mind that perpetually taints the gameplay experience of Diablo 3.
That idea is the subject of this rant.
When you farm items in Diablo 2 or WoW you're vaguely aware of the potential to sell items for money. You could visit a trade forum or Ebay to profit off your loot. The context within which items have a monetary value is outside the game proper. In Diablo 3, however, all you need to do is load the game, click 'Auction House', and then click 'USD'. Once you search for an item similar to yours, the game, itself, indicates the actual monetary value of your gear: "Click click click click click, that helm is worth $4."
You might not think that line significant. Instead of a third-party site, you can sell items within game. What's the big deal? The big deal is the erasure of that line, the integration of in-game loot with real-world economics. You kill a monster, leave your instance, click two buttons, and then discern the monetary value of the item you just obtained. The information required to assess your gameplay experience in terms of $/hour is right there, on the main menu, every time you load the game.
Now, you could vow to play in the "Amish style", which is to say that you abstain from any interaction with the Auction House. The difficulty is that every time you load the game you see the 'Auction House' button. Every look at that menu screen, every glance at the button, sparks the recognition of a potential to understand the game in terms of $. As you progress in difficulty the temptation rises to click that button, to seek out new gear. After so many wipes in Act 2 Inferno you have to confront the temptation of easily increasing your character's stats for just a few dollars: "If I pay $7.50, I won't die as much."
That's one of the more interesting aspects of the RMAH: It explains why people would pay $ for in-game items. Usually, people dismiss the idea as absurd since, "You're buying things that don't really exist." Why would you pay $20 for boots in Diablo 3 when you could buy real-world boots for your real world self?
Rather than think of the situation as paying $ for in-game items, think of it in terms of time. Suppose you make $20/hour at your job. Suppose the boots you want for your Monk cost $20 on the RMAH. Now, do you
1) Farm for countless hours in the hope of attaining the boots you want?
2) Buy those boots for 1 of your work hours?
Why spend 10 of your Saturday leisure hours farming for boots, when you could spend one Friday work hour to obtain the boots you want?
That's the thought: How are you spending your time?
When you think about it, you realize that Diablo 3 warps time into a commodity, a currency. I've "spent" X hours playing Diablo 3. In that time, I have earned $Y. So, Diablo 3 translates to $Z per hour. Moreover, those boots constitute a time investment. Would you rather spend 10 of your Saturday leisure hours farming, or buy the item for one of your Friday work hours?
When that thought enters your mind, when you conceive of the game in terms of $ per hour, you begin to rethink your impetus for playing. Why am I "spending" my life playing Diablo 3? Why have I "invested" all of this time in a game that only gives me $.58 per hour? Why am I farming for gear when I could get a job, farm that job for $, and then use that $ to buy exactly what I want? Why would I buy items for the game, anyway? Why am I even playing?
Yes, I had some fun experiences. I have a few neat memories. For example, last Saturday my first treasure goblin dropped a Stormshield, which sold for 3 million gold. That's cool. But it's difficult to translate that memory, that experience, into something quantifiable. I can translate the stormshield into a quantity, but not the experience of getting it.
That's the question of temperament upon which one's experience of Diablo 3 relies. If your mother drank while she was pregnant, you can probably herp and derp your way through the game killing monsters and have a gay old time. But if you can do math, you'll probably lean towards quantification, towards economics. When you think of the game in this way, it instantaneously transforms from hobby to something else.
It's not, exactly, a job. That's not the feeling of Diablo 3. Instead, Diablo 3 feels like...well...a subtle acid that slowly dissolves the pleasure once found in gaming. Diablo 3 is an addictive game that slowly evidences the problem with gaming addiction; it wastes your life while indicating just how wasteful the game, itself, is.
When you enter the RMAH, and start to sell items, you receive the means of quantifying your time spent playing Diablo 3. It's no longer about the feeling of killing monsters, of that momentary risk-hope-pleasure you feel when a rare drops. Instead, Diablo 3 reduces down to a simple problem of division.
I've /played Diablo 3 for 289 hours.
I've amassed $168 on the RMAH.
Diablo 3 gave me $.58 per hour, and a couple neat memories.
Sunday, June 17, 2012
D3DB.com posted the Increased Attack Speed % Nerf numbers:
- Haste 1: Old: (2-3%) New: (2%)
- Haste 2: Old: (4-5%) New: (2%)
- Haste 3: Old: (6-7%) New: (2-3%)
- Haste 4: Old: (8-9%) New: (2-3%)
- Haste 5: Old: (10-11%) New: (3-4%)
- Haste 6: Old: (12-13%) New: (3-4%)
- Haste 7: Old: (14-15%) New: (5%)
- Haste 8: Old: (16-17%) New: (6-7%)
- Haste 9: Old: (18-19%) New: (8-9%)
- Haste 10: Old: (20-25%) New: (10-11%)
- Haste 1: Old: (2-3%) New: (2%)
- Haste 2: Old: (4-5%) New: (2-3%)
- Haste 3: Old: (6-7%) New: (3-4%)
- Haste 4: Old: (8-9%) New: (3-4%)
- Haste 5: Old: (10-11%) New: (4-5%)
- Haste 6: Old: (12-13%) New: (5-6%)
- Haste 7: Old: (14-15%) New: (6-7%)
- Haste 8: Old: (16-17%) New: (8-9%)
Sell your IAS% gear before prices drop with 1.0.3.