Tuesday, November 20, 2007

Well, if Mike Franc says it's true...

I was reading the conservapedia and found a link to an article entitled, "The Reality of Thanksgiving" on humanevents.com (Leading the Conservative Movement since 1944).

I was surprised to learn that the Conservative Movement had access to the tubal interwebs since 1944 but more surprising was the information that Thanksgiving is actually a celebration of the triumph of Plymouth Colony over communism. From the article:

"But the Pilgrims’ triumph over hunger and poverty at Plymouth Colony can be traced to something more than the charitable gestures of a few local Indians. Rather, it involves their courageous decision to replace a failed, socialistic agricultural system with one informed by the free-market principle of private ownership of property"

Note the use of the word "Indians" as opposed to "filthy savages". The Conservative movement has truly come a long way.

Anyway, the article explains that Plymouth Colony suffered great hardships until "the colony’s leaders identified the source of their problem as a particularly vile form of what Bradford called 'communism'.” I always thought that the problems of Plymouth Colony were malnutrition and death, but apparently a socialist ideology was the true culprit. This evil force was that solved by applying liberal (get it?)amounts of free-market capitalism which allowed the colony to thrive.

The article cites no external sources to verify its claims which is fine I guess. I can't imagine that Mike Franc, vice president of Government Relations at The Heritage Foundation, would lie to anyone about anything.

3 comments:

Kylebrown said...

I wish I could disagree, but believe it or not the original Plymouth colony was a communist community. It wasn't totalitarian communism, but it was communist none the less. They did run into many troubles with it, mostly relating to motivation and morale, which was improved by switching their economy to that of a free market.

_J_ said...

You know what I love? The idea that settlers with low quantities of food and shelter couldn't find the motivation required to collectively amass the materials required to survive.

Go, Puritanism.

Kylebrown said...

Yeah it is really pathetic that people need wealth to motivate them when their life hangs in the balance...

I could never understand that.