It'd be kind of nice if you could keep all the labels, but only those with more than 5 entries or so would actually be displayed on the main page.
Otherwise, it seems to me that if we're going to treat labels as useful categorization tools, we're going to need to make some rules to keep them useful. Do I find the humorous article under "comedy", "funny" or "lol" is not a question you should even have to ask.
"Do I find the humorous article under "comedy", "funny" or "lol" is not a question you should even have to ask."
Obviously "funny" is more broad than either lol or comedy.
I do not think it a gigantic problem. We just decide on a label for "humor" and if someone makes a post and labels it "lolz" instead of "humor" then we lick the lolz label, it loads the post, and we edit the labels.
The problem comes with attempting to identify what sensible labels are. If someone goes through and renames 30 or so posts to all have the label "monkey-shit" and "monkey-shit" turns out to be not as broad a category as previously thought then one would have to go through and relabel all 30 articles.
I kind of want to get rid of the "news" label becuase I do not know what it means. The problem is that 75 posts use it.
Does "news" indicate that it came from a news site? Does it simply indicate new information? Is it an announcement? Well, we have an announcement label.
I like the "video game" label. It contains things related to video games.
or the "music video" label. It is a label used for music videos.
But, the helen a.s. popkin label is only used twice...but it's for articles which are really fucking popular. So it makes sense to have that label. And hellfire london? Shit yeah we'd have to keep the hellfire london label; it generates like 50% of our web traffic!
I looked Mikey, but the ads don't seem to be in any sort of container and the template doesn't give me any access to the post's templates themselves, to put them in a container.
I think it is a blogger issue rather than an adsense issue. Blogger should allow html level access to the post template, to allow us to wrap the adsense ads in a container for placement purposes.
awesome - i got the 20th anniversary edition (original version relased on DVD) which is laser-disc to dvd) no special features. I only cost 10$ and came with jaws 2
Old Navy has a commercial where three kids are wearing graphic tshirts. One has Spider-Man, another is Iron Man, and one has bubble yum or something.
The thing is, they're the pre-faded, pre-cracked-paint style with old art as though they were meant to be ironic. Can kids wear ironic shirts of things that kids like? Shouldn't they be wearing ironic vintage NPR shirts or something?
32 comments:
I think we have exactly one billion labels.
Do we think these need to be consolodated or are we ok with a billion labels?
Perhaps labels which have only 1 or 2 applications could be collected into broader categories?
Do I want Persona for PSP?
it seems kind of silly to have labels which are only used once.
kotaku pages load more slowly than intra. I will not follow your link.
Could we get the ads to fill the space below our posts created by our indecent number of labels, and perhaps put them inside a distinctly colored div?
It'd be kind of nice if you could keep all the labels, but only those with more than 5 entries or so would actually be displayed on the main page.
Otherwise, it seems to me that if we're going to treat labels as useful categorization tools, we're going to need to make some rules to keep them useful. Do I find the humorous article under "comedy", "funny" or "lol" is not a question you should even have to ask.
the label thing is an issue. But there is not god way to manage labels without going through all 1,552 posts and re-edit the labels.
also, if anyone can figure out how to mod the style sheets so the below the post ads are centered or alined with margins let me know
"the label thing is an issue. But there is not god way to manage labels without going through all 1,552 posts and re-edit the labels."
It is not that difficult. For example, the label "Mega Man" is only used once.
1) Click the label in the labels menu. This will load the post.
2) Click "edit post".
3) Change the label to something other than Mega Man.
Once the label is not used it goes away.
So it's just a matter of using that process on all labels not used a large number of times.
"Do I find the humorous article under "comedy", "funny" or "lol" is not a question you should even have to ask."
Obviously "funny" is more broad than either lol or comedy.
I do not think it a gigantic problem. We just decide on a label for "humor" and if someone makes a post and labels it "lolz" instead of "humor" then we lick the lolz label, it loads the post, and we edit the labels.
The problem comes with attempting to identify what sensible labels are. If someone goes through and renames 30 or so posts to all have the label "monkey-shit" and "monkey-shit" turns out to be not as broad a category as previously thought then one would have to go through and relabel all 30 articles.
That is something I would like to avoid.
I kind of want to get rid of the "news" label becuase I do not know what it means. The problem is that 75 posts use it.
Does "news" indicate that it came from a news site? Does it simply indicate new information? Is it an announcement? Well, we have an announcement label.
I like the "video game" label. It contains things related to video games.
or the "music video" label. It is a label used for music videos.
But, the helen a.s. popkin label is only used twice...but it's for articles which are really fucking popular. So it makes sense to have that label. And hellfire london? Shit yeah we'd have to keep the hellfire london label; it generates like 50% of our web traffic!
All of season 3 30 Rock is on Hulu.
I konw what i'm doing tonight.
"We may not be the best people, but we're not the worst; graduate students are the worst."
-30 Rock
I looked Mikey, but the ads don't seem to be in any sort of container and the template doesn't give me any access to the post's templates themselves, to put them in a container.
thanks kyle - i didnt see anything either. I will send an email to tech support and see if there anyway to fix that.
I think they would consider it broken if we could see and change those things.
I think it is a blogger issue rather than an adsense issue. Blogger should allow html level access to the post template, to allow us to wrap the adsense ads in a container for placement purposes.
Strawberry Peanut Buttle M&Ms.
I say thee, NO!
I boo the Strawberry Peanut Butter M&Ms!
Strawberry Peanut Buttle M&Ms?
wow
Are they as bad as Chocolate Skittles?
"Are they as bad as Chocolate Skittles?"
That was the first thing I thought of.
Strawberry M&Ms? Chocolate Skittles?!
Teh World r topsey turvey!
Wal-Mart had the Collector's Edition of Jaws in the $5 bin.
Win!
awesome - i got the 20th anniversary edition (original version relased on DVD) which is laser-disc to dvd) no special features. I only cost 10$ and came with jaws 2
Is there any reason to not skip the Anya and Xander non-wedding episode?
ummmmm
No, skip it.
Jaw Rifftrax:
FUCK
YES
move over Prussian Blue, say hello to the White Pride Pendergrafts
You DO want Persona.
And.. Hrmn.. wasteful labels can be useful when I remember them.
Thing is.. we really don't have much conversation that begs for, or even uses consistent labeling?
Seems to be a bit more for fun short commentary? Hrmn. MA makes a damn good point/suggestion
Basically, if we're going to reform labels, we're going to have to all commit to it.. which terrifies me.
and.. You know how to tell Strawberried Peanut Butter M&Ms were wrong? TF 2 branding. Fools!
Twilight Sucks
Old Navy has a commercial where three kids are wearing graphic tshirts. One has Spider-Man, another is Iron Man, and one has bubble yum or something.
The thing is, they're the pre-faded, pre-cracked-paint style with old art as though they were meant to be ironic. Can kids wear ironic shirts of things that kids like? Shouldn't they be wearing ironic vintage NPR shirts or something?
I mean, the next step here otherwise is a baby in an ironic Elmo bib.
@ma17 *sigh*
Or.. Elmo... wearing a SuperGrover shirt?
.. actually.. if Kevin Clash was wearing one.. that'd be kinda tight.
Hrmn.
Post a Comment