Monday, June 23, 2008

George Carlin: Philosopher, Mentor, Right

Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist.
- George Carlin

There is no blood, brains, or anima in any of the virtually identical George Carlin obituaries mindlessly replicated throughout the internet today more out of a sense of obligation than true sorrow or appreciation. Each in its own way minimalizes the life of George Carlin down to a sequence of events and a few passing references to his routines. George Carlin, when understood through these half-assed, trite, obligatory articles was merely a famous comic, a purveyor of counter-culture rhetoric and "That guy who did 'Seven Words You Can't Say on Television'."

But that is not George Carlin.

When Douglas Adams died, when Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. died, I knew that it was an end to a line of work, of writings. While I was saddened by their deaths I knew that their writings would linger on; I knew that I could continue to read Hitchhiker's, Slaughterhouse-Five. The men were dead, but it did not feel as if they were gone. When I learned that George Carlin had died...I felt alone.

George Carlin was more than just an author, an actor, an entertainer, a stand-up comic, a philosopher. George Carlin understood. And while I never met him, never saw him live, he was always a source of comfort for me. Because I knew that he was never only joking about religion, society, censorship, language, or stuff. Regardless of the particular subject George Carlin was always focused upon the fact that, in his own words:

"the longer you live, the more you look around, the more you realize...something is FUCKED-UP. Something is WRONG here."

That's who George Carlin was: George Carlin understood; George Carlin was right. And I took comfort in the fact that he was out there trying to get others to understand. Even if they dismissed him as an entertainer or merely humored him as he humored them...he was out there saying true things to people who needed to hear him. Yes, we still have his works. But we lost the man. And while we still have his message we lost the one most adept at communicating it.

In George Carlin we did not lose "the guy who said 'Seven Dirty Words'; we did not lose a comic. We lost a mentor, I lost a mentor, Sunday afternoon. We lost someone who was right.

And you can't replace that.

4 comments:

Roscoe said...

I wonder if perhaps the people who would be able to write those obituaries you looked for... the ones who could write them well?

I wonder if they're not digesting the news, collecting themselves, and if those aren't coming..

Becuase... they're less obituaries, and more.. eulogies, you're looking for..

Roscoe said...

a further thought?

The Adams and Vonnegut comparison..

seems odd. Is it becuase Carlin put his views out there more often? That is to say.. he continued to challenge and provoke?

Or is it because he came across BEST in a live performance.. live in the sense of his full body and vocal action. I noticed some of the obits reference his eyes when he was performing..

Is that possibly what makes his passing different? The fact that his remaining works are somehow impacted differently by the loss of his interpretative performance?

I'm honestly asking..

_J_ said...

Adams and Vonnegut wrote books. Their contributions survive and exist independent of them.

Carlin talked to people. He dynamically responded to the world in which we live. Carlin was a presence whose performances were a manifestation of that presense.

That's the difference to me. One can read the Hitchhiker's Series or Slaughterhouse Five and get it without any need for Adams or Vonnegut to be alive. Carlin was ever-present and constantly produces new insight.

And now we don't get any more.

Plus, I honestly never thought George Carlin would die. At least not yet.

Roscoe said...

But Carlin wrote books as well..

Further, Vonnegut WAS a prescence as well... considering he had a regular column in the Indy alternatives, AND could get a column in any paper at a moment's notice, when he felt it..

I think.. yeah.. his performance aspect, coupled with the fact that you saw him somewhat regularly, as opposed to the others is probably it..

That last sentence is dead on, though. Even looking back and realizing he didn't look great when he was interviewed, etc.. I never thought he looked BAD...