Friday, March 28, 2008

Ancestral Guilt: Inherited Idiocy

So friend works at the Freedom Center and last night called to talk about whatnot. During our conversation he told me that the Freedom Center has an authentic slave pen on exhibit. Apparently some people when confronted with the slave pen feel a deep sense of guilt which correlates to whether or not their ancestors owned slaves or participated in the slave trade. The thinking, using that term loosely, is that if great great great grandpa Jethromiah owned slaves then his presently living kin (who, mind you, are not slave owners) have reason to feel bad or guilty.

And I'm pretty sure that invoking that attachment to ancestry and so belaboring a fabricated notion of inherited guilt is fucking stupid.

I know that in the Western tradition we are inundated with the notion of original sin, the notion that we are all fundamentally flawed not due to what we do but what those who came before us did. But if you think about it? That idea has no basis in reality; we made it up.

Certainly one may employ a biological notion of heritage and so argue that as with genetic diseases ancestral sins are passed down from generation to generation. But to employ a biological basis for non-biological fabricated bullshit phenomena is, said plainly, moronic.

Moreover, a person's ancestral guilt is fundamentally based upon one's knowledge of their ancestry. If you do not know that great great grandpa Beasley was a slave owner, or a member of the KKK, or a Nazi, or Australian then you have no sense of guilt founded on your knowledge of great great grandpa Beasley given that you have no knowledge. This is not to say that by maintaining ignorance one may avoid the need for an embrace of ancestral guilt but rather indicates the nature of ancestral guilt: It does not exist until we create it. Upon one's discovery of an ancestor's transgressions one may invoke a sense of shame or guilt. But note how this process occurs! "Upon one's discovery".

It is not the case that one is born with the shame or guilt as, say, one can be born with an inherited genetic predisposition towards the acquisition of cancer. Rather, one adopts guilt, embraces guilt, fabricates guilt. There is no fundamental component of one's being from which ancestral guilt spawns: YOU MAKE YOURSELF FEEL GUILTY!

This is not to say that one ought to release one's feelings of guilt and rather embrace a feeling of pride over one's slave owning ancestors. Rather, my point is that one ought to shut the god damned fuck up about one's ancestors and relatives and focus, rather, on what you do; what you have done.

You are your own being. You are not a branch on a tree. You are not merely a link in an ancestral chain. You are not your parents, your grandparents, your great grand parents.

You are fundamentally your own individual being responsible for and beholden to your self.

Fucking act like it.

11 comments:

Caleb said...

responsible for and beholden to

I like the way that sounds. And, I approve this message except that I would like to see a footnote that explains to the kids at home that the mission of the Freedom Center is other than mere guilt-mongering.

_J_ said...

I don't think that the mission of the Freedom Center is to monger guilt. The Freedom Center is better than that.

Andrew said...

guilt comes from the blood money.

Andrew said...

Mission

We reveal stories about freedom's heroes, from the era of the Underground Railroad to contemporary times, challenging and inspiring everyone to take courageous steps for freedom today.

Caleb said...

I love it when a plan comes together.

Andrew said...

A few families in CT have been doing family research and found that their proud family lineage, dating back to colonial times, made their fortunes in the trans-Atlantic slave trade. To remedy their ancestral guilt they have found a creative solution: destroy the geneological records.

_J_ said...

"guilt comes from the blood money."

What blood money? The family existing in 2008 didn't own slaves. And if we're going to embrace the historical, ancestral guilt transferred through family wealth argument then, well, we sort of missed the point of the fucking rant.

And even in a situation in which a grandparent says, "This confederate dollar was gained by your great-great-great grandfather for selling his best cart-pullin slave named Sambo P. Coltrane" there's still some pretty stupid Platonic bullshit going on there.

"No, man. Like, the stain of slavery is like...on the money man. It's like...he like gained the money through slavery...so the money it like has slavery in it."

That's moronic.

Andrew said...

Im not a fan of generational guilt. but i do recognize that one could feel guilt knowing that the privileges they enjoy were attained by the buying and selling of human beings. That is a fair emotion to feel. the problem is when people say they feel guilting and believe that the guilt the feel means something. guilt is meaningless. take action.

also, plantation owners lost everything during the war. most of those families have no wealth. the ones who made fortunes are usually northern families who made fortunes via insurance companies and banks dealing indirectly with with the buying and selling of human beings.

_J_ said...

"the privileges they enjoy were attained by the buying and selling of human beings."

Given that the individuals presently living in the year our lord 2008 did not themselves own slaves I do not think that there is a need or justification for guilt.

They are at least two or perhaps three generations away from the actual slaveowners and any funds they currently posess were not gained directly from the buying and selling of peoples. At best they have funds which are interest off of funds which were interest off of funds obtained through the slave trade.

And the only time to give heed to that many degrees of separation involves Kevin Bacon.

Andrew said...

yeah. it is akin to companies that made money off the holocaust.

_J_ said...

Like Volkswagon.