Monday, July 30, 2007

Noah's Ark, Creationism, and Labradoodles.

Noah's Ark, Creationism, and Labradoodles are, I think, three ideas that work very well together to explain some of the problems with the ideas maintained by your average Dipshit Q.* Creationist.

The first labradoodle was bred in 1989 by Wally Conron who was, we can assume, the sort of person who would try to get minature poodles and Labradors to have sex. Since Labradoodles did not exist until 1989 and since the events of Noah's Ark occured before 1989 (presumably) we can conclude that Labradoodles were not on Noah's Ark. Additionally, we know that Wally Conron, not God, bred the first Labradoodle in 1989.

So we know that the Creationist idea that, "Every species that exists always has existed, so there." is demonstrably false due to Labradoodles. We also know that the idea that, "All animals that exist now were on Noah's Ark, so there" is also demonstrably false due to Labradoodles. Additionally we know that it is possible for species which at one time did not exist to come into existance via breeding, as was the case with the Labradoodle. In other words, the Labradoodle evolved from the breeding of two other types of animals. So the notion that evolution does not occur can also be shown to be demonstrably false due to the Labradoodle.

So maybe all we needed to do was send that schoolboard in Kansas a Labradoodle. At the very least it would have been fun to have watched them try to explain it away.

* The Q also stands for "dipshit".

4 comments:

Andrew said...

nice arguement, but a labradoodle is not a new species.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species

_J_ said...

You're not a new species.

Kylebrown said...

andrew beat me to it.... :(

Caleb said...

fast as fast never turning back